History of the Browser User-Agent String

I’ve only done user-agent string sniffing once and I remember it gave me a headache… This post explains why it gave me a headache! :(

And then Google built Chrome, and Chrome used Webkit, and it was like Safari, and wanted pages built for Safari, and so pretended to be Safari. And thus Chrome used WebKit, and pretended to be Safari, and WebKit pretended to be KHTML, and KHTML pretended to be Gecko, and all browsers pretended to be Mozilla, and Chrome called itself Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13, and the user agent string was a complete mess, and near useless, and everyone pretended to be everyone else, and confusion abounded.

via Daring Fireball

Spread the Word
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • connotea
  • HackerNews
  • Print
  • email

About Daz

This is the blog of Darren Oakley
This entry was posted in snippets and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to History of the Browser User-Agent String

  1. Another wonderful example of the futility of “Literal Values”. User Agents should have URIs :-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="">